[pct-l] Hiking Kilts

[Reinhold Metzger]

Craig,
For some reason I fail to see the advantage of a kilt over soft, loose
fitting and baggy shorts.
I know the argument.....better ventilation and therefore less likely to
develop a rash.
The way I see it, but enlighten me if I am wrong, with soft baggy shorts,
which are much lighter than a kilt, you don't need underwear and you get all
the ventilation you could ask for.
The kilt will only improve ventilation without underwear, and that is the
problem.

JUST THINK...a shapely girl in a mini skirt.....without panties, siting  on
a log, or bending over''....Photo opportunity
You would have the same problem, ore worse, if you are a low rider.

I can see it now...girls walking by glassy eyed...stumbling over each
other...with you sitting on a log fully exposed.
If you are not careful you could wind up like Burt Reynolds....a center fold
in Playboy Magazine.

I think baggy shorts without underwear are more practical then kilts with or
without underwear.

JMT Reinhold
Men's fashion trends designer